 |
| We're all Patty Hearst now. |
[Editor’s Note: The bastards at
MLS Live have yet to release the full game to the archives and I don’t have
cable. As such, the deeply detailed conclusion to this report, which I promised
yesterday, yeah, that ain’t happenin’. Time’s too short.]
[A Note from Randall: I went
through and chopped out some of the kudzu from the original post while Jeff’s
back was turned. The man loves his words and analogies irrationally and too
well.]
Between getting home late
[Thursday]
night, drinking all the water in the entire goddamn neighborhood, trying and
failing to relax using a (literally) numbing variety of sleep aids, and waking
[Friday]
morning with a pack of wild dogs tearing at the wrinkled matter between my ears
[we’re talking about one of those existential hangovers of the soul] […cut more
stuff…], I had
[to put off posting] anything about the
Stockholm Syndrome spectacle that the Portland Timbers put its fans through last night until [today].
Having reviewed the [severely,
unjustly limited] tape, I’m going to put [my best foot forward, the one without
athlete’s foot] to [make some sense of that rare, magnificent thing, the
genuine historic game]…
…and I’m still coming to grips
with how I’m not going to die in a bar Sunday afternoon from watching all those
games. So, check your local news for that one ("Man Dies in a
Hillsboro, Oregon Bar: Could This Story Be More Depressing?") We're
talking David Blaine-level feats of street magic idiocy.
[Editor’s Note: Caught Randall, the
little shit; locked him in cellar with a two pound bag of carrots and a case
of Snapple. Everything’s below is different. Moving on.]
I’ll begin by saying that I
learned a thing or two last night. For one, I learned that men over 40 should
not yell for two straight hours. The medical term for this is “stroke risk.”
Whatever, I earned it: the goddamn terrible ref (Armando Villarreal), whose
series of coin-flippingly perverse decisions put health and safety at risk, let
the physical crap get out of hand, and then came a penalty kick shoot-out that…that…look,
the thing existed in a world beyond sensation, in spite of itself. The level and
frequency of wobbly penalty shooting was enough to make a member of the
English National Team blush; a less invested audience would have shifted out of tension
and into impatience. And yet, could anyone at Providence Park have been
anything short of all-in?
I want to pick up the Stockholm
Syndrome theme because I think it’s endemic to sports fandom. The defining rule
of one team per trophy means that, with each of Major League Soccer’s
competitions, major (MLS Cup, the long lusted-after CCL trophy) and minor (U.S.
Open Cup, Supporters’ Shield), means that 19 teams miss out every single time. For
those 19 teams, a given fan’s peace of mind, his/her sense of the season, turns
on how early into the journey his/her club falls. 12 of MLS’s 20 clubs are now
officially out of the running for MLS Cup; only one of those, e.g. the same
Sporking…ooh, typo, but I like and am sticking with it. Anyway, of all the
clubs out of the running for MLS Cup, only the same Sporking KC club has a
consolation/prize trophy to validate their season.
Stripped of variables like the
quality of the players, a good coach at the helm, various curses (looking at
you, Toronto FC) every team in MLS has a 5% chance of winning one of the three
domestic trophies. Even with the variables in play, the sheer mass of vagaries
built into MLS as a competition, argue in favor of sticking with that 5%.
Basically, disappointment is the likeliest conclusion to any season for
virtually every soccer fan in the country. And yet a fan is bound to his/her
club. He or she pushed past expectations of disappointment, or even abuse for
fans in Chicago, Colorado and Philadelphia, and just invests in the club. In that sense, then, fans are captives, sometimes abused ones, and yet they always love their captors.
The team rewards its fans on a
good day: think of Thursday as the sort of day when our collective captors give
us a little more chain and drop some fresh fruit into the will-sapping gruel they
normally serve. Regardless, the Portland Timbers did us all a solid when they
lugged their proverbial “big, brass balls” longer and further than they had to,
or arguably should have. We all just witnessed history, which is a privilege
anytime it actually happens. I know I’m thrilled I was there for it. Super
fucking glad, honestly. It was an honor to share the evening with each and
every person in that stadium, as well as the unknown thousands watching at
home.
After putting up such ornate
framing, it’s time to turn to the game, what happened in it and what it might
mean going forward. Anyone who read this post’s first iteration knows that I
cut and pasted the thing into something other than what it was (and something
better, hopefully). One crucial confession, however, needs to stay in place:
which I’ll preserve in the block quote below:
“Talking about what needs fixing
is sort of this site’s Prime Directive. The urgency of a do-or-die game runs
said Prime Directive right the fuck over: all I could see [Thursday night] was
the ball and where it was or wasn’t going. I was too busy pleading with Timbers
players and all the gods whose names my mouth could still form to get the ball
in the correct fucking goal (this was a short list in the end, outside of gods
named “Oowwauggghhh, FUCK!!!”). This lead to some weird things.
“First of all, I can only
remember the goals that came in extra time: Krisztian Nemeth’s, the one that
put KC up a goal late and forced my heart into my throat, and Maximiliano
Urruti’s; but I only recall the latter as a bulge in the net. I only know who
scored the other two (Rodney Wallace, for Portland, and Kevin Ellis for KC)
from reading a couple write-ups today.”
I left in a couple hasty first
impressions as well, but I’m only keeping the three I liked. Here are those:
- I want to nestle inside Nat
Borchers’ beard for as long as this season continues. It bet it feels safe in
there. (Just saying it again, Borchers has been excellent this season; second
only to Diego Chara for me in terms of importance.)
- Things got steeply fucking
worse when George Fochive came on.
Last Word on Sports slipped a graph into its review (supplied
by the
Armchair Analyst) that pointed to a decision on Portland’s part to
bunker and try to ride out the win. Whether or not that was true*, Fochive
stood out time and again by playing the ball behind and generally away from
teammates. By the time he stepped up to take his PK, I had zero faith that he’d
put it away.
- * Oh yeah, Liam Ridgewell
lumped a ball straight up the middle during this period, and..I think that’s
when my voice gave out. And the little vessels in my brain went, “pop!”
OK, onto the new stuff.
As I read match recaps of game, the
one idea that I kept coming across was Portland’s “domination” of the first
half. This is precisely why I’m cranky about not being able to review all, or
most of the full, archived game, because the 20-minute mini-game simply can’t
capture this. Not being able to directly verify that – and I need to verify due
to the gaps in memory and perception noted above – leaves me stumbling through this
post like some stoned, half-prepared teenager trying to mumble his way to a
solid C on an oral presentation. Again, fucking MLS Live. To carry on,
dutifully…
Up to the point when Wallace
scored Portland’s opener, that condensed game showed an early feast of corners
for the Timbers, a couple cracks in the KC defense that Sporking quickly
patched up (Matt Besler got a pretty big shout-out in
ExtraTime Radio’s review),
and a couple fouls by KC that most people (
ETR’s neutral professionals included)
agree could have been red cards (again, my frothing frustration with Villarreal
is both fresh and totally justified).
The box score gives Portland a meaningful
edge in shots overall and…and…hold on, just digging into the interactivity of
the box score feature. Holy shit. Anyone else know about this? Feel like I’m in
one of your higher end science museum for kids. What’s this button do….ooohh…..
Anyway, the numbers that best
match my memory of the game show up in Portland’s possession and passing
accuracy stats. The accumulation of give-aways proved maddening by game’s end; as
noted above, Fochive was terrible on this score, but he had plenty of
co-conspirators by the end of the second half.
Possession with Purpose forwarded
a decently plausible theory that the shift brought on when Fochive came on for
Lucas Melano
cratered Portland’s possession by ceding too much of both the
field and the ball to Sporking KC. Again, I thought I saw this earlier, again, I
confessed to not remembering the goals, which are sorta a big deal, so take a
big lick of salt before swallowing this here shot of tequila.
All in all, though, as much as
the Timbers struck me as sloppy and impatient in possession (and I accept it
got worse as the game wore on), the central feat of their performance comes
with going to toe-to-toe against a Sporking team that often relies on “setting
the tone” – or, non-euphemistically, they foul often, hard and with less shame
than they ought. Maintaining that level against the Vancouver Whitecaps team
that comes to visit tomorrow – i.e. well-rested and with a “robust” presence of
their own in central midfield and defense – becomes a very real challenge, if
not an area of concern. I expect Vancouver will let them play more than KC did,
but cracking that strong, central core won’t come without some hammering. So,
god damn the short turn-around.
Since I can’t dig deep on the
game (grrr…), I thought I’d close with thoughts on the three Timbers players
who received too little praise for the win, at least in my estimation. In no
particular order…
Rodney Wallace
Fortunately, the mini-game
featured enough data points to highlight Wallace’s considerable contribution to
the win. He did more than score the scrappy, opening, coulda-been-a-winna goal
(which he finished ever so well), e.g., how often he stretched KC vertically,
he hard he battled on set-pieces, etc. etc. etc. It does even deeper, though.
When I took a tour through the
Conifers & Citrus archives for a sort of
big-concept post a
couple weeks back, I noted how often I gave positive notice to Wallace;
a recount taken just now pulled six examples of uncomplicated praise for Rodney,
and across the length of the season (there were also three instances where I advocated
for throwing Wallace on the trash heap; still, twice as many good as bad!). The
point is, Wallace enjoyed a solid 2015 and, for me, too few people gave his
season the credit it has earned. A lot of the talk has centered on Melano since
he came on board – and,
yes, that comes
in both good word and bad – but Wallace does a very respectable job of opening
up space for Portland. His decisions aren’t always perfect – Rodney flails in
crosses and lost-cause shots with the best of ‘em – but he’s also a helluva an
asset and an even better bargain.
Dairon Asprilla
Very few people I talk to rate
Asprilla as highly (irrationally?) as I do; I even snuck in a compare/contrast
with Melano in
a modest little hit-piece on our young, costly Argie about a month ago. I’d
also that Asprilla lent support to my estimation of him with that performance in
extra time, and even during the shoot-out. Yeah, yeah, the assist is the
obvious thing, but the mini-game also featured a strong dribble/distribution
sequence that did Darlington Nagbe proud (think he was even the recipient).
Asprilla didn’t get much opportunity to contribute this year, never mind shine.
I view that as a mistake, even as I’m as hard-pressed as anyone to come up with
how Caleb Porter, et al. fits him in. My two-word answer to that:
squad rotation. Along with every club in MLS, the Timbers need more of it.
Maximiliano Urruti
Urruti did very well to knock in
the goal that saved Portland’s season, because, hot fucking potato. Seriously,
if you’ve ever tried to re-direct a ball moving that fast I’m confident it didn’t
look nearly as good as Urruti’s did. It goes without saying that it hasn’t been
Maxi’s year. It’s also fair to argue that, like Asprilla, he didn’t get much of
a chance either. To be clear, Fanendo Adi earned his role as First Forward
(thinking First Violin for some reason), but, 2) again, squad rotation, and 1)
I think Urruti’s approach to the game syncs up fairly well with how I believe Portland
attacks best…
…think I’ll leave it there,
otherwise, I’ll go on for another two pages. I know there’s a reckoning coming
with players like Asprilla and Urruti; there are others besides, but I think
Wallace is safe (better be safe, dammit). I just think this is something that
the Timbers organization needs to work through very carefully, and the above
players’ contribution to an historic win shows why.
As for the Vancouver series, it
sucks a little to acknowledge how damn unfavorably it lines up. Portland starts
with a home game on heavy legs, followed by a road game. There is a key detail
in the equation – namely, that both Portland and Vancouver travel well,
7-8-2versus 7-7-3, respectively. And that strikes a curious balance in that it
alludes to the possibility that Vancouver could trouble a tired Portland club
at home, while also staying open for return service in the second game at BC
Place.
It’ll be very interesting to see
how Portland plays that first leg. Wide-open sounds very dangerous on paper. I’ll
close on that. Damn. If nothing else, 2015 ended really well.
