 |
| Inadequate. |
As much as I like the playoffs better (and with how much
more I’d like with the Portland Timbers still in it now officially noted), they
don’t provide much space for analysis. A bunch of things happen over each 90-minute
stretch (plus stoppage time), generally/interchangeably the same kinds of
things that happen over 90-minute stretches (plus stoppage time) throughout the
regular season, but there’s not a hell of a lot to say about coughing up three goals in 20 minutes than, “well, guess they’ll have to score four goals next
Sunday.”
That’s FC Dallas’ situation, of course, after having a
team-wide episode of “The Vapors” against the Seattle Sounders to start the
second half. Sure, you can explore what went wrong on each of the goals (rough
night for Maynor Figueroa, but the central defense wasn’t central on Seattle’s
first two), but even if Dallas can fix those glitches on the return leg, it’s
likely to have the same effect as pouring a glass of water on the ashes of your
house after it burned down. I’m not a Dallas fan, so I’m left imagining how
slowly time passed for them as Nicolas Lodeiro’s long run outside their defense
reached its inevitable, agonizing climax. Personally, I had enough time for a
sip of beer on either side of thinking “he’s not gonna miss that.”
That’s a huge win for Seattle, obviously, and a huge hole
for Dallas. The only question left is, can Dallas make up the scorched ground?
Not based on what they gave last night. Seattle held the edge all night, for
one, but the blunter reality came with how much trouble Dallas had going
forward. To borrow a term from MLSSoccer.com’s Matt Doyle, Dallas is missing their
unicorn, Mauro Diaz. Things didn’t look great when Mauro Diaz went down or
anything, but his absence didn’t kill them all on its own. Now, however, when
they need to find a way forward and a minimum of three times, too? No better
time for magical beasts.
As for Seattle, they’re a great bet over the next 90 minutes
– wouldn’t surprise me if they won in Dallas even – but dubbing them a
juggernaut doesn’t hold up either. They
benefitted from a couple HUGE let-offs against Sporting Kansas City, e.g. SKC
had a goal called back for offside, while their lone goal was offside, and more than SKC's, plus the question of whether or not Osvaldo Alonso should
have stayed in the field. What might have been without Alonso on Sunday is a
fun hypothetical, but, with both results in the books, it hardly matters. All I’m
saying is that Seattle owes its current spot in the cat-bird seat to a few bad
calls and twenty minutes of really shitty defending by Dallas (also, KC got reacquainted
with the goal posts again). Unless Dallas makes history, Seattle will have to
start fresh against either the Los Angeles Galaxy or the Colorado Rapids and I’d
put money on either series looking more like what happened in KC.
So, that’s the biggest story and (probably) deadest series
of the weekend. What about the rest? In order of degree of difficulty…
New York City FC developed a reputation for playing on the
front foot, but they had a hell of a time leaning in against Toronto FC. Their uneven
share of emergency defending stood out most over the 20-minute version of this
game, but I’m not sure whether to chalk that up to formation/tactical choices,
or the absences that (might have) forced those choices. How much do Andrea
Pirlo’s head-of-a-pin outlet passes mean to the quality of their attack, or how
much does it force a defense to stay honest? How much did it matter that NYCFC’s
best chances fell to R. J. Allen on Sunday (because dude’s a fullback)? However
it happened, they didn’t look like themselves, but they did survive…even if the 2-0 loss leaves them hanging over the abyss by one hand (beats Dallas’
fingertips), but, of all the teams in MLS, NYCFC has a better chance than most
of coming back from 2-0 down…or of letting in a goal or two or three going the
other way. Between Jozy Altidore, Sebastian Giovinco and one of the league’s
better defenses, the stuff after the ellipses feels a lot more likely than the stuff
before it.
Happily, the other two match-ups feel very much like anybody’s
game. Full credit (and just a smidgen of hate) to the Montreal Impact for
hitting the right buttons at (just!) the right moment. Their win over DC United
at midweek had the same “great-day-at-the-office” feel as Seattle’s win over
Dallas (e.g., mistakes (asleep) by the opposition (way too much space) made it larger), but, unlike Seattle,
Montreal don’t benefit from their blowout. They carry a slim one-goal lead into
the second leg against a New York Red Bulls team that looked better in every department
- except the one that makes beautiful goals (nice crack, Mr. Mancosu). New York
met their quota for forcing turnovers – the one where Dax McCarty, Felipe
Martins and Sacha Kljestan combined to pick the ball off Ignacio Piatti speaks
to how suffocating the pressure can be – and they got the ball in Montreal’s 18
time and again, but they could never punch through to goal; for a compelling
sample, please see Bradley Wright Phillips late, late miss (check this clip at about 3:20 mark). I think most people
expect more of the same – and I mean that literally; the Red Bulls piling on
pressure and Montreal absorbing it – and that, as much as anything, speaks to
the task ahead for New York.
It’ll be tough, certainly – scoring goals is hard, y’all! - but
a player like Alex Muyl gets at what makes the Red Bulls a reasonable bet. Muyl’s
a first year player, just 21 years old, but he fits into New York’s system because
he’s both technically strong and, more significantly, smart. Having players
with those same quality throughout the team fosters a mutual faith within the
team that makes it possible to pull off more intricate passes, more complicated
combination play, and so on. Those attributes allow inventiveness, in other
words. The same thing showed up with Lodeiro when Seattle started rolling:
Jordan Morris dropped this blind heel-pass into a tiny sliver of space that
could only have come good if he knows Lodeiro will continue his run. And he
did. Still, I’d take New York’s attack over Seattle’s most days, but Seattle
has something that New York would kill for – and might have to kill for when
the final whistle blows next Sunday: a sound defense. If there’s a series
likely to turn on an away goal, it’s New York v. Montreal.
Finally, there’s LA v. Colorado, a good game won on an ugly goal.
Still, credit the goal to Jelle Van Damme, a player I’m still kicking myself
for underestimating over the first half of the regular season (or, rather, I
got so caught up in his cheap fouls that I missed his considerable and varied
upside); he’s a solution on both sides of the field, and players like that win
teams games, even championships. Colorado required big moments from Tim Howard
and Jared Watts to stay in this one, but not too many of them; this was no rout
or anything. Of all the conference semifinals, this series stuck closest to the
script. The Rapids managed the game well enough, but the question with them hasn’t
changed: can they score? And they need to – twice now. Maybe that’s why Pablo
Mastroeni opted to rest Marlon Hairston, or maybe that he was left out as a
game-changer.
That’s it. I’m mostly happy about the playoffs so far, feel
like the right teams are winning, etc. I’m also glad that two of the series
still look like entertainment (in other words, I know who I’ll be watching next
weekend). And, can I say again that I want Portland to either get Jared Watts
or to find some close version of him? The Timbers need his kind of mobility
back there…
No comments:
Post a Comment