I had no expectations, at least not good ones. The Portland
Timbers played under what expectations I had in the first half before rallying
to a kind of latent respectability in the second. A pillow soft goal by Sporting Kansas City's Johnny Russell late in the game undercut the "latent" part of that whole "respectability" thought: in the end, the
Timbers looked like discombobulated shit losing 0-3 at Sporting Kansas.
Still, if you ask after the state of my faith, I’d tell you it’s
fine. This past week had "suck" written all over it, especially after the home
loss to the Vancouver Whitecaps; neither of the week's road games looked easy in context (and,
for the record, here are my thoughts on the 1-4 loss to DC United) and also,
the road. Given SKC’s recent uptick - e.g., they’ve now won as many straight (3!)
as Portland has lost (3?) - this loss really did have the predictability of
getting lung cancer from smoking. I won’t buy a
doom-spiral until Portland loses another game or two and on some track similar
to giving up nine(!) goals and scoring only two. The team would inevitably drop some points this season - every team in MLS does, and usually in bunches - but the good ones recover, to where they win games like DC United away, maybe draw away to a rising
SKC side.
The Timbers looked like that team I could lose all faith in
tonight and, bring it in for a big group hug, and right now, I will still love that team, yes, the one that struggles. At the same time, I can’t even begin to organize tonight’s errors into
some kind of useful hierarchy: the mistakes came from all over the field (no,
you have to earn “pitch”), and each of the breakdowns on those three goals were
whimperingly pathetic. For a team that has made defense its calling card so far
this season, goals like that violate the fucking brand.
And, if you want to ask what’s wrong, this feels like the
quickest answer: the Timbers have lost their way defensively and have therefore
lost their way. There’s not much more to take out of giving up 3.0 goals per
game over their last three (why the decimal? no idea). As for what causes it, questions
proliferate until you’re tangled up in chicken-egg madness. With the loss to
DC, did the disconnection between the defense and the midfield cause the
problems, or should the defenders cope far, far better to…call them
catastrophic breakdowns in midfield? That was easier to answer tonight with the
red-carpet-welcome goals SKC scored, and that’s a new, disastrous calling card, something a team has to swap out before it kills them? Even when SKC missed, they moved
through and around a stunningly stagnant Portland team with depressing ease, and
all over the field. A cousin of the same bug played out on the other side of
the field? Timbers players: you can’t play back to goal if you keep letting
your defender step in front to receive the in-let pass. (And maybe the team is
still sorting shit out post-Fanendo Adi, etc. All the same, how long had it been since Adi started/played?)
Why has the defense flown off the goddamn rails? I’m going to pass over an
obvious answer - e.g., “dude, Lawrence Olum is the fulcrum of your back three”
- and move to indict that same back three as the problem. The past several
weeks have thoroughly shaken my faith in Larrys Mabiala and Julio Cascante -
yes, enough even for a spare thought about Liam Ridgewell to come to mind, and
without the first reply to that thought being, “no” - but I’m also thinking
that the Timbers simply don’t have the personnel for a back three. If you watch
SKC’s second goal, in particular (but also Cascante failing to “defend on an island”
for much of the game), I’d argue you’ll see why it takes a special set of
defenders to play in a three-player back-line. Portland’s left has been bad
enough over the past two games, at least, for whispers of “Vytas?” to dance in the
winds, and that’s because an ever-growing succession of teams have got behind on that side and wrecked havoc.
Cascante, a center back, effectively playing as a left
fullback in something like a 3-5-2 (frankly, I don’t know what to call that
mess they showed before the game) has a lot to do with that. With Marco Farfan
some form of invisible for a lot of this game (but he was there, because here he is!), SKC could isolate Cascante wide time and again today and, look, he
just struggles defending close to the touch-line. For what it’s worth, I don’t
think Mabiala does any better as the second line of defense behind Zarek
Valentin as a wing-back, and having Olum in the middle of all that doesn’t
sound nearly as sound as Alvas Powell at right, Mabiala and [whoever] in the
middle, and with Valentin out left. Maybe an available-v.-injured thing played
a role tonight - there's something hopeful - but this formation has failed as often as Giovanni Savarese has trotted it out. Sure, some of those Christmas tree formations probably flexed to a
3-5-2, and that’s a counter-point, maybe a footnote on the futility of talking formation when personnel is the issue. Moving on…
File all the goals SKC scored tonight (here are the other two) - and even some of
their chances - under “Things You Keep From the Children.” And this takes the conversation away from
formations to talking about “posture” - i.e., the way the Timbers approached
the game. “Not well,” obviously, but I’ve seen teams defend as deep as
Portland did tonight, but they confront every pass into its own half with enough
intensity to call said posture, “bristling.” The Timbers didn't “bristle”
tonight, and consistently - nearly every player in green and gold spent a lot
of time walking and staring, in fact - and that’s how you give up three points,
three goals, and over three times as many shots to the opposition (not to
mention running up shots on goal to a multiple of 10). That’s also just about
everything about why I didn’t expect much from this game: these guys are tired.
Just about every positive scenario that I ran through my head featured an
energized, swarming Portland team putting SKC into some kind of wrestling/MMA
reverse - y’know, like the old swash-buckling, counter-attacking games from the
best parts of the Timbers’ 15-game winning streak? For tonight’s game, I wanted
compact, yet aggressive, defense, plus the two-to-three fingers of doom
reaching out to poke the eyes of the opposition.
I was looking for some sign that the Timbers had some piece
of past-2018 glory in their boots, basically, and it’s hard to find anything
positive in tonight’s drubbing.
And, you know what? Fuck it. Call it this the science
project the Timbers didn’t prepare for, the school play where they thought they
had their lines down only to realize on opening night that they’d put more time and
thought into their 50 Shades of Grey fan-fic. And, sure, maybe if these three
games hadn’t come after a 15-game unbeaten streak, my butt would be a lot more
puckered about, again, the sheer awfulness of the goals the Timbers, again, a
team that, prior to the past week, lurked amidst the lower nobility of MLS
defenses - and that’s at a minimum - gave up tonight. Tonight didn’t spell “playoffs”
for anyone dressed in green and gold. “Layoffs,” maybe, but not playoffs.
To wrap this up on a high note, the Timbers have some
winnable games ahead - e.g., hosting Toronto FC and the Colorado Rapids (even
as that one ain’t what it used to be) and the New England Revolution and the Houston
Dynamo away. Sharper readers might have noticed I didn’t list the Seattle
Sounders in Portland next weekend. All I have to say about that is brace yourselves. Be ready to have a full-body ejaculation in the event of a win, but
also…just do what you gotta to cope with a loss. Because, well, we don’t talk
about that, now do we?
Post-game grump: The 3-5-2 to me means that Gio had decided that if he didn't have the quality in the mid, he'd fill it up with quantity. A bunch of averageness overwhelming the other team's mid quality. Watching KC smoothly play through our mids to set up what looked like a practice field attacking drill in our half said the plan wasn't working.
ReplyDeleteOur guys did look gassed out there. That's at least one reason that Mabiala, Cascante and Valentin weren't effective. They were hands on the hips, trip over your own feet, exhausted.
Our middle-of-the-pitch guys right now are really a uneasy mix of callow youth, age-diminished skill guys and supporting players unlikely to have one brilliant moment for the whole 90 minutes. Opponents can comfortably mark an Armenteros out of the game if you know that the Timbers midfielders pose no scoring danger at this point in the season.
At least one of the people I watched with was beside himself with how easily SKC played through the defense and midfield. And that's a tidy description of the situation in midfield - especially last night. Whoof.
ReplyDelete