The Portland Timbers had just one job this past weekend: getting
the result
they needed. Well, two technically: the other involved prayer,
meditation, counting the rosary, listening to a god-awful goddamn sermon, flagellation,
fasting, e.g., the devotional act of each Timber’s choosing. The Timbers got
that result (guys! it was my lucky shirt!), and in a weird one (two penalties in
one game, nay, one half? Are the soccer gods making up for 2014 all at once?)
with a1-0 win over the till-then Supporters'-Shield leading Colorado Rapids. The game could have
ended 2-0 to Portland, 2-1 to Colorado, or even 1-1. It didn’t and good for all
of us.
Resisting the urge to explain new formatting concepts…resisting…resisting…winning…let’s,
uh, dig into the details of Portland’s win, shall we?
|
Yep, this is the one! |
Nice win and all, even if about as inspiring as watching a
basically average team pick up three late-season points. (Wow, literal and really
close to home.) As for a big take-away, you can I was right, you can see I was
wrong, you can say I don’t take MLS’s capacity for whimsy even sort of
seriously enough; fuck it, I’m happy that I low-balled Portland’s chances
pretty severely
in this post (my only defense: severe is what I do). I’m not
saying the Western Conference end-game is pretty. Think Bum Fights, only less
desperate and disgusting (ugh, can't use this as an image). More on that later.
There are some grim take-aways. First, raise your hand if
you think the Colorado Rapids got the better chances (in case the implication’s
not clear, my hand is up). All in all, the Rapids look like a team that knows
what it wants to do – or, more clearly, that defense knows what it’s about and
that only leaves the offense needing to get lucky. And the defense buys them a lot of time. (Anyone else recognize that recipe for success? Something about
2015?)
That said, credit Portland’s defense (mostly; think what
might have been if it was Marlon Hairston, or even Dominique Badji running onto
that ball in the 5th minute instead of Caleb Calvert) for giving the Timbers
enough time to find a little inspiration. The perky little
wellspring who brought the required aggression when it was needed was Vytas Andriuskevicius (from Lithuania with love?). He bustled into the box twice and picked up a PK on each trip, but I do think the
cosmos weighed its scales about right in the end. I don’t think Vytas was fouled on
the first call, the one
Fanendo Adi scored, but he
was fouled
on the second –
e.g., the shot
Adi missed. Twice (The second time certainly looked like the
gods shitting all over hubris.) Vytas is growing on me. He could have
big upside, provided Portland can provide cover for his forays ahead; maybe Porter can find
a way to cheat with him the way Columbus Crew SC cheats with Harrison Afful
(though hopefully, like, better, and without the defensive liability).
At any rate, that one goal got Portland there. As I tweeted
at the end, at this time of year, it’s
not what you do to earn the result, it’s just getting it. A couple other
Timbers helped make that happen, or failing that, kept Colorado honest just
long enough. I like Darlington Nagbe in the latter category; he looked 2015 in transition
and he forced as many smart, controlled turnovers as anyone but Diego Chara
(still the king), and a healthy number of them came in the attacking third;
he also showed a rare interest in the attack, which was nice, even if the
quality and/or advisability of the shot added up less and less as the game wore
on (shut it, Bull, or the kid might stop shooting again). Diego Chara did stand
a little taller for me, though, stacking up the slick little steals and the
only person I’m pissed off about that soft (soft, soft) yellow is Silviu
Petrescu. Chara will be missed…even if I didn’t catch that till after the game.