![]() |
| Dream big, Fire fans...could be your bandwagon... |
In keeping with this site’s practice
of starting local…
The Oregonian posted one of their
damn slideshows (sorry, hate the things, because they feel more about the ads;
yes, I’m aware of the state of the news industry) that framed the issues facing
the Portland Timbers in the form of 11 questions, some more pointed than
others. To quibble with the premise a little, I’d argue that, if you can come
up with 11 questions – if you get that granular – you probably have 20+
questions. To hit that from the other side, with the way personnel overlaps and
cross-pollinates, I think the Timbers have between three and five questions to
answer in 2017.
I’ll come up with those later
(tomorrow, maybe; or Monday), but, for now, the best question of The
Oregonian's 11 was the last (paraphrasing): are the Timbers good enough to make
the 2017 playoffs?
And they flagged the one major detail
that slips my mind every time I think about the Portland Timbers: how
large-scale erratic they’ve been. Or that’s just another way of admitting that
the flukiness of the 2015 Run to Glory still somehow doesn’t sit right with me.
At any rate, that whole “erratic” theme is something head coach Caleb Porter
has to answer for.
Moving on to other pastures…

